It’s not identical to TNG - let’s not overlook the impact of Trek ’s first female lead, or Voyager -specific hallmarks like retiring the “Captain’s Log” trope in favor of in medias res teasers - but for fans looking for more than a new coat of paint on their old favorite show, Voyager is a disappointment.Įvery once in a while, though, Voyager captured the excitement that it should have been delivering every week, such as in “Prime Factors” (S1E10). Voyager ’s crew famously uses over three times the number of “irreplaceable” photon torpedoes they’re said to have at the start of the show, wrecks at least ten shuttlecraft without comment, and is seen relaxing in the holodeck at least as often as any other crew. Apart from the need to limit the use of food replicators in favor of home-cooked meals from local produce, any implication of higher stakes or rougher conditions aboard Voyager are easily dismissed. Sadly, Voyager devolved into The Next Next Generation, with the Maquis seamlessly merging into the Starfleet hierarchy far too quickly and the ship herself always in working order no matter what kind of pounding it took in the previous episode.
HOW BIG IS VOYAGER STAR TREK SERIES
The series pitched in “Caretaker” could have been a nice change of pace after Star Trek: The Next Generation, whose setting was basically a heavily-armed flying luxury hotel backed with the authority of a galactic superpower. They’ll have to learn to work together as they face hard choices with zero relief and zero oversight, visiting strange new worlds not just to explore, but to survive. We’re introduced to our cast, made up not only of traditional Starfleet heroes but also a band of outlaws called the Maquis who don’t care for Starfleet’s rules and directives. The two-hour opening chapter, “Caretaker,” (S1E1) strands Captain Kathryn Janeway (Kate Mulgrew) and the USS Voyager in the Delta Quadrant, a distant corner of the galaxy far from the United Federation of Planets where all previous Star Trek series take place. Voyager ’s cardinal sin is its failure to live up to its premise. And while Voyager ’s flaws are glaring and systemic, there’s still a lot to enjoy if you’re willing to take the journey.
Both shows were follow-ups to the beloved Star Trek: The Next Generation - Deep Space Nine struggled in first-run syndication while Voyager was a hit for a new network (UPN, RIP), but after a quarter-century of hindsight, the critical consensus is that DS9 was a groundbreaking gem while Voyager was safe and commercial, the beginning of the end for a once-mighty pop cultural force that some maintain has never recovered.Ī loud segment of Trekkies delights in tearing into Voyager (on account of it’s easy to do), but just as many have fond memories of the series and will defend it to the end of the galaxy.
It’s sort of the Weezer “Green Album” to Deep Space Nine ’s Pinkerton. The years haven’t been terribly kind to Star Trek: Voyager, which marked its 25th anniversary this month.
0 kommentar(er)
